Fracking has a radioactive problem

fracking radioactive problem
fracking has a radioactive problem say new Nature study. Picture:

Harvard scientists have found that fracking is associated with greatly increased radioactive particulate in the air. People who live within about 12 miles of fracking sites are at the highest risk, with ambient radiation as high as 40 percent over the background level.

The data comes from 17 years of measurements at over 150 radiation monitoring sites. Scientists examined these measurements, combined with the location data on more than 120,000 fracking wells.

While experts have known fracking can release chemicals into the groundwater in particular, this is the first study to analyze radiation levels.

Fracking may be a lot of things, but the idea that it’s literally radioactive could be surprising.

The reason is that a lot of underlying rock contains small amounts of uranium, for example, as part of the naturally occurring bedrock found all over Earth. Where conventional mining adds safety precautions and traditional oil drilling doesn’t interact with bedrock the same way, fracking has gone a third way that pulverizes the bedrock and releases the uranium.

Unconventional oil and natural gas development (UOGD)

The study refers to fracking by a technical name: unconventional oil and natural gas development (UOGD).

As of 2017, over 120,000 onshore UOGD wells had been drilled via a practice involving directional drilling combined with multistage high-volume hydraulic fracturing (fracking),” the researchers explain in the paper. “Meanwhile, numerous controversies have arisen, partially due to the potential harmful impacts on the local environment, and on the health of nearby residents.

Without an established track record of research, scientists can’t make meaningful observations about how fracking is affecting radiation in the air or not. The nationwide network of radiation observatories, built during the Cold War when nuclear war was an ever-present fear, offers a unique chance to triangulate fracking locations and radiation levels.

The scientists crunched the data for each radiation measurement in combination with the many fracking sites — 1.5 million total — that dot the U.S. They found that radiation sites within 12 miles of heavy fracking activity, as the wind blows, had higher radiation levels than are otherwise explained.

These associations suggested the existence of some pathways by which UOGD activities could release [radioactive material] into the atmospheric environment,” the researchers say.

Likely mechanisms

Likely mechanisms include:

  • the fugitive release of natural gas, which contains a higher-than-background level of radon at wellheads, compressor stations, pipelines, and other associated facilities
  • the management, storage, discharge and disposal of flow-back and produced water which is rich in [radioactive materials]
  • the accidental spill or beneficial use of produced water in nearby communities
  • the handling, transport, management, and disposal of radioactive drill cuttings.

There are a lot of places in the process where radiation could be leaking into the air. And in those same locations, water might also be contaminated by hundreds of carcinogenic substances. But with data in hand, the people in charge of fracking wells can examine these risk factors up close and make simple changes, whether that’s better gaskets or more careful filtering of waste water released into communities. Just like natural gas, knowledge is power.

More fracking news on Nature, The Guardian, Yahoo, Strange Sounds and Steve Quayle.

Follow us: Facebook and Twitter. By the way you can also support us on PaypalPlease and thank you!


  1. They want San Andre Falts go with this full moon? They do a lot of fracking close to the san andre is not nice at all.

  2. The fear of low level radiation has been an effect tool of many organized groups for years now. In the oil strata areas of the USA the use of pressurized Guar bean gelatin to push sand away from the well heads has been maligned now for several years. Most places that “fracking” is used the oil field pressure is causing seeps that is how productive clogged wells are indicated. So in areas where the wells have been clogged by wax and sand the pressure increases and leaks into water and ground surrounding the well. In the northern part of Peru there has been an abandoned shallow well leaking since 2009 and by 2012 when I surveyed the area 265,000 acres had oil contamination, fracking would have and can still save the rain forrest in this case.
    The fear associated with the radiation is kind of messy in logic. Many people routinely install quarts and granite counter tops that radiate at levels hundreds of times higher than the well head gas. I have been exposed to several different isotopes over many years of high tech work, the effect is minimal.
    One for instance is commercial welding gas Argon can have small amounts of Radon as part of the mix, more expensive lab gas is Radon free. In my shops I have used Geiger (muller) sensors to measure the exposure and labeled the cylinders by safe exposure time limits for my self and employees.
    Helium gas used in children’s balloons also can contain Radon at measurable levels.
    If you live in any American city you are receiving similar levels of exposure to a radiologist in a hospital. Every building facade radiates.
    The findings of elevated radiation from the Gama Radiation Detectors installed in the northern parts of the USA are minimal and can be influenced by the current solar minimum.

    It is pretty simple to see that oil and gas are the USA’s way out of debt and socialism. Political activists will use any and all detractors to frighten people away from American Supremacy.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.