U.S. nuclear power reactors with highest risks of meltdown from earthquakes are in South Carolina and Missouri

U.S. nuclear plants in S. Carolina, Missouri face the highest quake risks
Picture: H.B. Robinson Plant by Nuclear Regulatory Commission/Flickr

The U.S. nuclear power reactors facing the highest risks of a meltdown from earthquakes are not in tremor-prone California, but states including South Carolina and Missouri, an analysis of government data published on Thursday said.

The chances of an earthquake leading to meltdowns are small, but the results would be grave. A tsunami generated by a 2011 earthquake led to the meltdowns of three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in Japan, causing radiation releases and mass evacuations.

U.S. nuclear plants in S. Carolina, Missouri face the highest quake risks
U.S. nuclear plants in S. Carolina, Missouri face the highest quake risks. UCSUSA

H.B. Robinson near Hartsville

The U.S. reactor facing the highest risk is Duke Energy Corp’s H.B. Robinson near Hartsville, South Carolina, according to the analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Robinson faces a one in 7,700 chance annually that a quake would cause a meltdown, said the analysis, based on Duke’s estimates submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). That risk is five times higher than for each of PG&E Corp’s two Diablo Canyon reactors, the only ones left in California. Those reactors are scheduled to be shut in 2024 and 2025.

Oconee in Seneca

The three reactors at a Duke plant called Oconee in Seneca, South Carolina, face a one in 17,500 chance of a meltdown annually, according to the analysis.

All Duke nuclear plants are in compliance with NRC requirements for earthquakes, and the company has bolstered structures, systems and components, said Mary Kathryn Green, a company spokeswoman.

Callaway reactor in Fulton, Missouri

Ameren Corp’s Callaway reactor in Fulton, Missouri faces a one in 13,800 chance of a meltdown annually, the analysis said. Barry Cox, the site vice president at Callaway, said the plant invests millions of dollars on protections against earthquakes and other natural disasters.

Edwin Lyman, the director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, who wrote the analysis, said that the NRC should not approve license renewals for Duke’s reactors unless the company does more to guard against risks.

The NRC is satisfied that Duke has made “binding commitments” to install permanent fixes at Robinson and would assess earthquake risks in a license renewal application, said spokesman Scott Burnell.

The map in the article below shows the US nuclear reactors vs the fault lines… and thus shows where earthquakes could result in nuclear nukes in the USA.

More nuclear disaster news on UCS USA, Yahoo, Strange Sounds and Steve Quayle.

Follow us: Facebook and Twitter. By the way you can also support us on PaypalPlease and thank you!


  1. If the cost of nuclear power included babysitting radioactive wastes for 250,000 years, nuclear power would be deemed economic suicide.

  2. We must also include Canadian reactors as well, one is close to Wisconsin , Toronto in Onterio and West Coast we should added to list if i am wrong please correct me. Thanks a lot strange sounds for great info.

  3. This list is not even remotely complete. For instance the new reactor Obama built in Georgia is not included nor are the TVA reactors located near Scottsboro, Alabama.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.