Giant remains have been discovered under four feet of guano in Lovelock Cave in Nevada.
According to the Paiutes, the mummiffied remains belonged to the Si-Te-Cah, a legendary red haired band of cannibalistic giants roaming the area.
Just before you start reading this article, I would recommend two amazing works on giants: True Legends – Episode 3: Holocaust of Giants by Steve Quayle or Steve Quayle’s book Genesis 6 Giants – Volume 2.
The Oral Tradition
The northern Paiutes of Nevada have an ancient oral tradition that they have passed down from generation to generation that usually causes the hearer to pause in bewilderment. The Paiutes state that long ago in ages past they went to war against a ferocious enemy known as the “Si-Te-Cah” or “Saiduka.”
Now, here is where this prehistoric tale becomes fascinating. According to the Paiutes, the Si-Te-Cah were a race of red-haired cannibalistic giants that would literally devour the flesh of their foes! The chronicle states that after three years of blood-weary-battles, a coalition of regional tribes finally unified together to conquer this savage enemy. The allied tribes bravely pushed the Si-Te-Cah back into the depths of a very large cave and quickly covered the entrance with brush piles. A fire was then set ablaze that began to suffocate the giants and any would-be escapees were quickly shot with a fury of fire-piercing arrows. The giant cannibalistic carnivores finally met their grim fate in a blazing cavernous inferno.
“Si-Te-Cah” is said to be translated as “Tule-Eaters” in the northern Paiute language. Tule is a species of water plant that grows in marshes across North America and would have grown in “Lake Lahontan,” a Pleistocene lake that once covered much of northwestern Nevada around 12,700 years ago. According to the oral tradition, the giants used the tule to weave rafts in which to navigate the lake, flee surprise attacks from the Paiutes and worst of all – capture the Paiute women who would gather tule near the shore of Humboldt lake. [1]
The Written Account
The legend of the Red haired giants began to rapidly spread in 1883 when Sarah Winnemucca, daughter of Chief Winnemucca, wrote the first known autobiography by a Native American woman called “Life Among the Paiutes: Their Wrongs and Claims.” In her book, Winnemucca discusses a tribe of barbarians that she says were known as the “People-Eaters” who lived along the Humboldt river and who would waylay her people and eat them. She states the following in her memoirs:
My people say that the tribe we exterminated had reddish hair. I have some of their hair, which has been handed down from father to son. I have a dress which has been in our family a great many years, trimmed with this reddish hair. I am going to wear it some time when I lecture. It is called a mourning dress, and no one has such a dress but my family. (2)
Sarah Winnemucca © WikiMedia Commons
Giant stature and red hair would obviously be considered genetic anomalies in the context of this account. So to the skeptics who say the Si-Te-Cah were not actually giants but just a tall enemy tribe, I ask the following questions…
Q. Why did the Si-Te-Cah have red hair & not black hair like the other indigenous tribes of the area?
Q. Why would one of the most influential Paiute families of the region save the red hair of their enemy and carefully pass it down from generation to generation and then trim their most treasured garments with it if it was just the hair from a normal human being?
Comment: The full text of Sarah Winnemucca’s story of the Si-Te-Cah reads as follows:
Among the traditions of our people is one of a small tribe of barbarians who used to live along the Humboldt River. It was many hundred years ago. They used to waylay my people and kill and eat them. They would dig large holes in our trails at night, and if any of our people travelled at night, which they did, for they were afraid of these barbarous people, they would oftentimes fall into these holes. That tribe would even eat their own dead – yes, they would even come and dig up our dead after they were buried, and would carry them off and eat them.
Now and then they would come and make war on my people. They would fight, and as fast as they killed one another on either side, the women would carry off those who were killed. My people say they were very brave. When they were fighting they would jump up in the air after the arrows that went over their heads, and shoot the same arrows back again.
My people took some of them into their families, but they could not make them like themselves. So at last they made war on them. This war lasted a long time. Their number was about twenty-six hundred (2600). The war lasted some three years. My people killed them in great numbers, and what few were left went into the thick bush. My people set the bush on fire. This was right above Humboldt Lake. Then they went to work and made tuly or bulrush boats, and went into Humboldt Lake. They could not live there very long without fire. They were nearly starving.
My people were watching them all round the lake, and would kill them as fast as they would come on land. At last one night they all landed on the east side of the lake, and went into a cave near the mountains. It was a most horrible place, for my people watched at the mouth of the cave, and would kill them as they came out to get water.
My people would ask them if they would be like us, and not eat people like coyotes or beasts. They talked the same language, but they would not give up. At last my people were tired, and they went to work and gathered wood, and began to fill up the mouth of the cave. Then the poor fools began to pull the wood inside till the cave was full.
At last my people set it on fire; at the same time they cried out to them, “Will you give up and be like men, and not eat people like beasts? Say quick – we will put out the fire.” No answer came from them. My people said they thought the cave must be very deep or far into the mountain. They had never seen the cave nor known it was there until then. They called out to them as loud as they could, “Will you give up? Say so, or you will all die.” But no answer came. Then they all left the place.
In ten days some went back to see if the fire had gone out. They went back to my third or fifth great-grandfather and told him they must all be dead, there was such a horrible smell. This tribe was called people-eaters, and after my people had killed them all, the people round us called us Say-do-carah. It means conqueror; it also means “enemy.”
I do not know how we came by the name of Piutes. It is not an Indian word. I think it is misinterpreted. Sometimes we are called Pine-nut eaters, for we are the only tribe that lives in the country where Pine-nuts grow.
My people say that the tribe we exterminated had reddish hair. I have some of their hair, which has been handed down from father to son. I have a dress which has been in our family a great many years, trimmed with this reddish hair. I am going to wear it some time when I lecture. It is called the mourning dress, and no one has such a dress but my family.
“Life Among The Paiutes: Their Wrongs And Claims” is available online courtesy of the University of Pennsylvania.
The Cave
About 93 miles northeast of Reno and situated inside an outcrop of limestone that forms part of the Humboldt Mountains, Lovelock Cave sits like an ancient fortress. As I entered this massive cave that is approximately 150′ x 35′ at its widest point, I felt as if I was going back in time. The first thing I noticed was that the entire cave roof was charred black from fire and smoke. But, before I document the incredible discoveries found inside the cave, check out this quick video of my visit to this amazing site a few years ago:
The Artifacts And Specimens
In the autumn of 1911, a group of miners led by David Pugh and James Hart began digging out 250 tons of bat guano to be used as fertilizer when they began to discover countless well-preserved prehistoric artifacts. The University of California was notified and eventually sent out L. L. Loud in the spring of 1912 to conduct archaeological excavations at what is now known today as Lovelock Cave.
The collection was divided up between the Nevada Historical Society and the University of California. A further excavation was conducted in 1924 by the Heye Foundation who employed M.R. Harrington, who also collaborated with Loud. In their 1929 field guide titled “Lovelock Cave,”
Loud and Harrington mention a few different dates regarding when ancient inhabitants might have first visited Lovelock Cave with the oldest date being around 4000 B.C. However, a mummy found nearby in Spirit Cave, has since been carbon dated at around 10,000 B.C. 1 Unfortunately, Loud did not maintain a comprehensive report of the excavations so all of the detailed information is not available. These archaeologists found artifacts, specimens and remnants of advanced basketry, weaving, pipes, ice picks, nets, balls, knots, darts, horns, weapons, skin, human body parts, zoomorphic stone effigies and more. In their book “Lovelock Cave,” Loud & Harrington make the following statement:
The preservation conditions in Lovelock Cave are unusually favorable, recalling those of Egypt and Peru and being equaled at only a very few sites discovered in North America.
The Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology at the University of California wrote:
Lovelock Cave, despite years of destruction, is one of the most important sites in the history of North American archaeology.
But, it gets better. The following are some of the most fascinating artifacts and specimens that were uncovered.
The Calendar
A donut-shaped stone with 365 notches carved along the outside and 52 corresponding notches along the inside, which some believe is a calendar.
Duck decoys
The Decoys © Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian
Eleven duck decoys made of rush and tule were found painted and feathered and are considered to be some of the world’s oldest and most elaborate ever discovered. The original decoys are now preserved at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C.
The Sandals
The sandals found inside Lovelock Cave are not like others from the region. These tule sandals are known as V-Twined-Bag-type sandals, as they are made in the same way as woven bags. There are many reports that a pair of these sandals measured 15 inches long. [2]
The Burnt Arrow Shafts
Loud and Harrington state: “Tending to confirm the Northern Paiute legend of the assault on the cave are the fire-arrow foreshafts… A very large number of arrow fragments were found in the crevices of the rockfall blocking the mouth of the cave, as if they had been shot into it… as if fired by the flaming arrows mentioned in the legend.”
Burnt arrow shafts © L.L. Loud and M.R. Harrington
I found several statements by Loud and Harrington that seem to indicate their surprise at finding extremely large arrow shafts. It’s almost as if it’s so hard for them to believe, that they surmise if the arrow shafts were made for different purposes:
Of weapons we found only a large, heavy, pointed foreshaft of greasewood, larger than those commonly used for arrows …
The arrow fragments and foreshafts typical of the upper levels were not found in this one, but instead a single pointed foreshaft so large that it probably belonged to an atlatl dart rather than to an arrow.
Q. Were these abnormally large shafts made and used by the Si-Te-Cah to battle the Paiutes?
The Giant Pestle
The giant pestle was not discovered during the Loud & Harrington excavations, but was found some time after. Dr. Gene Hattori who is the curator of Anthropology at the Nevada State Museum makes the following shocking statement about the giant pestle… “We recently received a donation of a pestle that was found below the mouth of Lovelock Cave and it is extraordinary large and very heavy… it is much larger than we usually find… it was found below Lovelock Cave and well within the Si-Te-Cah territory. So, this could have been one of the pestles used by the red headed giants and might account for its large size because of the large people that were using it.“
Q. Why is this giant pestle only able to be seen in a private back room at the Nevada State Museum and not on display for public viewing?
It is pretty amazing to me that we now have both of the original archaeologists who first excavated Lovelock Cave, as well as the curator of Anthropology at the Nevada State Museum on record validating the oral tradition of the Paiutes and the written record by Sarah Winnemucca regarding a race of red-haired cannibalistic giants called the “Si-Te-Cah.”
Again in their 1929 book “Lovelock Cave,” archaeologists Loud and Harrington state the following:
The Northern Paiute have accounts of an extinct people living in various localities in Nevada which recall the beliefs in northwestern California regarding an ancient now extinct race of supernatural beings.
Richard J. Dewhurst, Researcher and Emmy award-winning writer & author of the book “The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America,” says the following:
The artifacts themselves prove that an advanced culture did indeed predate the Paiute Indians.
The Humanoid
As I scoured the appendices in the back of Loud and Harrington’s field report, I was shocked to see this photograph of what appears to be a child-like humanoid that had been mummified and wrapped in a woven fur robe. Consider the size of the skull in comparison to the size of the body. Look at the placement of the large eye-sockets along with the smallish face and jaw. [3]
Q. Is this yet another strange genetic anomaly such as the red-hair and gigantic size of the “Si-Te-Cah?”
Based on their oral traditions, the northern Paiutes would be the only people to have actually seen the red-haired giants known as the “Si-Te-Cah” alive in the flesh. However, there are many witnesses who claim to have seen the bones and skulls of these prehistoric cannibalistic carnivores that measured anywhere from 7 feet to 10 feet in length.
The Miners
After centuries of bat guano build-up upon the cave floor, the first people we have on record of being on scene at Lovelock Cave were the guano miners in 1911. Miner James H. Hart testifies to the following:
After some of the best specimens had been destroyed… In the south end of the cave, ‘about twenty feet deep,’ we unearthed some skeletons. In the north-central part of the cave, about four feet deep, was a striking looking body of a man ‘ six feet six inches tall. ‘ His body was mummified and his hair distinctly red… the man was “a giant. [1]
6-6 ft may not be considered a giant, but it is creeping close to the 7ft benchmark. And we do have Hart on record confirming it had red-hair and declaring it “A Giant.” So, along with the length of this skeleton, we should also consider the girth and mass of these bones as well in light of Hart’s comments.
John T. Reid was a mining engineer and an amateur anthropologist from Lovelock, Nevada who could speak the Paiute language. Reid claims to have examined and measured several giant skeletons that were either from Lovelock Cave or the surrounding area. Below is a newspaper article from the “Nevada State Journal” from April 17, 1932 that mentions Reid and a 7-7 foot giant skeleton as well as two of Reid’s encounters with giant bones.
In February, 1931, a Lovelock resident informed Reid of the “weathering out” of a large skeleton on the lake bed near Lovelock Cave. This was excavated with great care and all the bones were recovered. Before removing it, Reid measured it in situ and it proved to be ” 7 feet 7 or 6 inches in height… It had been buried in a shroud and covered with a dark substance, perhaps charcoal.”
The “Lovelock Review-Miner” reported on June 19, 1931 that Lloyd De La Montoya of California had discovered the skeleton of a “giant” on the lake bed near Toy... Reid, John Foster and Thomas J. Chapel set out across the dry flat to the site… the skeleton was recovered… it was deduced that this man had been “nine and one half or possibly ten feet” tall. [2]
The Archaeologists
In their 1929 field report entitled “Lovelock Cave,” archaeologists Loud & Harrington make the following statements about the skeletons and skulls:
It is quite likely that members of the crew excavating the guano took away bones, especially skulls… The best specimen of the adult mummies was boiled and destroyed by a local fraternal lodge, which wanted the skeleton for initiation purposes. Several human mummies and parts of mummies were obtained by the guano crew and the writer…. Much of the hair found on the mummies in the cave is reddish. [3]
Q. Was this “best specimen” of the adult mummies a giant skull? We now have Loud & Harrington confirming that they uncovered mummies with red hair. In the appendices of their book, they also reveal two intriguing photos – one of a humanoid looking child (See here in part 2) and one of this large skull shown here.
The Mummies and Giant Skeletons Discovered Near Lovelock
The “Nevada Review Miner” published an article in it’s 1931 June issue reporting two very large skeletons that were found in the Humboldt dry lake bed near Lovelock Cave. One measured 8.5 feet in length and was described as having been wrapped in a gum-covered fabric similar to Egyptian mummies. The other skeleton was nearly 10-feet long.
This newspaper article dated January 24, 1904 from “The Saint Paul Globe,” documents the discovery of a “Skeleton of a gigantic human being” in Winnemucca, Nevada by workers who were digging in the gravel. A “Dr. Samuels” examined it and pronounced it to be nearly eleven feet in height.
13 miles east of Fallon Nevada is Spirit Cave. In 1940, two very well preserved mummies were found expertly wrapped in highly sophisticated weaving by Sydney & Georgia Wheeler working for the Nevada Sate parks division. The mummies were radio carbon dated to 9,400 years before the present. DNA testing of the mummies by Douglas W. Owsley, division head of physical anthropology at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History revealed that the mummies were of Caucasian origin, with a long face and cranium that most closely resembled either Nordic or Ainu ancestry and bore no ancestry relationship to either the Paiute or Shoshone tribes. This groundbreaking news has received barely a glimmer of attention in the outside world. [4]
The Humboldt Museum Witnesses
There are a handful of people who have testified to seeing giant skulls from Lovelock Cave in a storage room at the Humboldt Museum in Winnemuca, Nevada. Two of theses witnesses are Don Monroe and M.K. Davis. Below are a series of statements made by M.K. Davis regarding their experiences:
The Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca Nevada used to keep a series of human skulls in a cabinet in the basement for private viewing. They have now repatriated the skulls and no longer have them. I saw them in 2006 and photographed them in the cabinet. Don Monroe photographed them some 30 odd years ago and they were different. Compare the photos and you can see that not only are some missing but there is an extraordinary mandible that was there in the prior photo but missing from the later one. This mandible has had the teeth filed. Here is the photo that Don Monroe took some 30 plus years ago. Pay attention to the fact that there are more artifacts then and more particularly to the mandible that is arrowed.
“Below are the skulls as I photographed them in 2006. This is a stitched photo.”
“These photos are original prints taken some forty years ago in the basement of the Humboldt museum in Winnemucca, Nevada by Don Monroe. The Museum now denies the existence of this and other skulls. Why??? Notice what appears to be “double rows” of teeth.“
“These photos were taken by Don Monroe back in the 1970’s and recently discovered among his things that were boxed up. Don Monroe has been adamant that there were large skulls there then, that are now missing. This seems to support his claim. I hope that this serves to clear up whether these larger skulls did exist at the Humboldt Museum. Right now they emphatically deny that such skulls were ever there. They obviously were.” [5]
Notice how large the reddish looking skull in the middle is in comparison to the other skulls.
The photograph at the top of this blog post as well as the next one below appear to be taken by another witness at the Humboldt museum by the name of “Donn Quijote.” I first saw his pictures and read his testimony in an archaeological blog forum. His story and photographs seem to closely corroborate what M.K. Davis and others have said:
I was lucky enough to be shown these skulls before they were told to keep them from the public. This was in Nov 2008. Having read about the skulls on the internet, and I was making a trip to California, I stopped by the museum in Winnemucca to see if there really were giant skulls. I looked through the museum and saw artifacts from the Lovelock Cave were they were supposed to have been found, but didn’t see any human remains.
My wife & I then asked the curator there, a lady in her 80’s or so, where the giant skulls were. She got a big smile on her face and asked me to follow her. She led us back into a storage room and opened up a cabinet with the remains of 4 large skulls. She said that people from all over the world come there to ask her about those skulls.
I asked why they weren’t on display and she said it was because they did not want them to be taken away by any claim from the Indians, and also that Nevada state does not deem them authentic. But according to accounts of Indians themselves, they are not even the same race. I asked her if it was true if there were large red headed mummies taken from the cave, and she said that they were and that she had seen them, but they were taken to UC Berkeley… [6]
Notice the same large reddish skull that was photographed by Don Monroe decades earlier appears to be pictured here in 2008.
The Cover Up
In their 1929 field report “Lovelock Cave,” archaeologists Loud & Harrington seem to make a cryptic statement regarding their findings:
The lot from which each specimen came is recorded in the catalogue of specimens in the University of California Museum of Anthropology, but except where the fact seems pertinent to some problem it is not presented in the following account. [7]
Q. Does this statement indicate that any giant skeletons and skulls they might have uncovered were considered a “problem (Pre-Indian Caucasian culture)” to main-stream scientific thought and were therefore not recorded in their catalogs and furthermore not put on display for public viewing?
Richard J. Dewhurst, Researcher and Emmy award-winning writer and author of the book “The Ancient Giants Who Ruled America,” says the following:
Recently it has been confirmed that four of the ancient skulls unearthed at Lovelock Cave are, in fact, in the possession of the Humboldt Museum in Winnemucca, Nevada. According to Barbara Powell, who is the director of the collection, the museum is prohibited by the state of Nevada from putting the skulls on public display because “The state does not recognize their legitimacy.” They are instead kept in the storage room and shown to visitors from all over the world only by request. In addition, Powell said that additional bones and artifacts were transferred to the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of anthropology in Berkeley, California, where they are kept but also never put on display. What is significant to note is that the scientific community has assiduously scrubbed all references to the six-to-eight-foot-tall, red-haired skeletons found at the site. As will be seen, this repeated effort to clear the historical record of all references to a pre-Indian Caucasian culture in the United States can be seen as working in harmony with the NAGPRA policies of the federal government, which works on agendas based on political correctness and not objective science. [8]
Explorer, author and co-creator of “The Watchers” film series, L.A. Marzulli makes the following statement:
The question is why would men of science deliberately engage in this? And, I believe I have an answer. If skeletons exist, and by all of the overwhelming evidence both from the written record found in newspapers and accounts from scientists, as well as the oral traditions from Native Americans, they pose a direct threat to the pervading world view, Darwinism. [9]
The Pieces of the Puzzle
To bring this 3 part investigative series to a conclusion, let me lay out all the pieces of the puzzle for you one last time:
- We have the Paiute oral tradition of red-haired giants who they burned alive inside a cave.
- We have the written account from Sarah Winnemucca about the red-haired “People Eaters” and her most treasured dress passed down from generation to generation trimmed with this red hair.
- We have Lovelock Cave that is charred black from fire and burnt arrow shafts found inside of it.
- We have testimony from the archaeologists and the curator of anthropology at the Nevada State Museum of the advanced artifacts, extra large weapon shafts and giant pestles found in and around the cave.
- We have photographs of the humanoid looking mummy and the large skull found inside the cave.
- We have the archaeologists on record saying that the mummies found inside the cave had red hair.
- We have the testimony of the miners and the newspapers reports of several 7 to 10 foot skeletons that were unearthed.
- We have the mummies found nearby in Spirit cave carbon dated at 9,500 B.C. and DNA tests that prove they were not Paiutes but of Caucasian origin.
- We have the photographs and testimonies from the Humboldt museum witnesses all telling the same story.
- We have the Vice President of the Humboldt museum stating that the museum is prohibited by the state of Nevada from putting the skulls on public display.
Q. So did the Red-Haired Giants of Lovelock cave actually exist? I’ll let you decide…
To learn more about Ancient Giants, I would recommend watching True Legends – Episode 3: Holocaust of Giants by Steve Quayle or reading Steve Quayle’s book Genesis 6 Giants – Volume 2.
@Bob Sep 14, 2020 At 10:08 pm I see what your saying but theres another imagine of these skulls which shows a different angle. the smaller skull even though it is lying down the lower parts of that smaller skull including the cheek bones are actually a little closer to the camera than the cheekbones of the big reddish skull, and despite the reddish skull being a bit farther from the camera than the smaller skull the cheek bones of the reddish one still look quite a bit wider than the cheek bones of the smaller skull despite the smaller skulls cheekbones clearly being closer to the camera than that of the reddish ones. and if its wider than the smaller skull, then it is definitely taller than it too. the image is on a site called greater ancestors, I cant find that article they did idk if it got taken down or not but I have a screenshot of that different angle I dont think I can post it here though.
man i wonder if their dimensions like their circumference was ever measured especially of that big reddish one
Vikings or nephilim.
Probably upset the apple cart to say vikings were here before indians too.
Although, I believe it to be true based upon a dig that was covered up.
A problem I have with saying the redish skull was much larger, is that it is displayed at a much different angle, that might make it appear larger that it actually is, in comparison to the other skulls.
To the Victor goes the spoils, you cry baby pansies whine so much about being owed something. Guess what, you should have fought harder and not got your asses beat time and time again.
The Millions of Native Americans are the same race, descended from no more than 250 unrelated people. They are a single race on Two continents, they are homogenous in that the Chumash are more closely related to the yaghans and the ache in South America., as opposed to the nNorthern Europeans have Mongoloid Siberian DNA and Southern Europeans have Sub Saharan African Admixture , might as well be two separate races. I find it hilarious when idiots like you try to claim Greece, Rome or Egypt for “ the Northern Europeans. Since Europe IS in Asia, all Europeans are Asians, there is no such thing as a European, maybe an Asian or Eurasian if I want to be generous! Stop wetting your panties about the Aztec or Maya, they are still better than you Germanic Barbarians. At least they had civilizations, unlike your cannibal ancestors! Is that why you are wetting your drawers looking for White Red headed cannibals in America?! America is not your homeland, you are an invader to my land, you have no deep history or ancestral remains that have your dna! Go fondle yourself thinking of your own ancestral remains!
You are rude and vile. Surely you can express yourself without mentioning those who might be incontinent of urine over the search for unusual humans who might be considered “giants”, or the result of a dna anomaly. New information on humans of the past surface every year. And studies of these humans are yielding all kinds of fascinating details. So much to learn about those who came before any of us, how they lived, the hardships they endured, and what they had to do just to survive another day. Their stories are being revealed as time goes on. I have great admiration for any and all humans as they struggled without any of the modern tools & medicine that have allowed most of us to live in comfort, without fear of being murdered, starving to death, kidnapped, etc. We still need to help those less fortunate, give what we can, and move forward into a better future for all, hopefully without ending up downtrodden ourselves. It won’t be easy, many of us don’t want to give up our little place in the sun, that we worked so hard to achieve. Just do what you can, learn something new & positive, like emergency medical care. You never know when YOU will have to step up and help someone in your family or on the street, but at least be of service in some way to your fellow man or woman. Or some zombie cannibal.
Good luck. Take care. Be thankful for what you have. It could have been worse.
That was nice and youyou have right. I wish good to you. and for every one else as well, but they have to gelp on them selves so they can get help to other.
A Youtube video(link wont post)Giants Emerging Everywhere by Universe Inside You at the 16:35 mark has film footage of a real giant in Japan…
Marching with the army…not a tall dude..a giant
Check it out
I love Universe Inside You!
The red haired giants were the First Nations. the Indians that came after, were not. Also the Norwegians were the first people to arrive in North America. The old stone houses proved that.
You are ignorant! Their were no such thing as Norwegians when the Native Americans first existed as the founding race of the 2 continents. When Norwegian last did finally show up, they had to live in a small colony, unable or unwilling to fight the Native American people. The “ Red Haired “ giants never existed. The Lovelock Skulls were DNA tested already and proven to be closely related to the near by Paiute and other Great Basin tribes. You are not Native to the land, nor are Norwegians or Europeans. Stop being jealous of the great feats of exploring and founding of the great 2 Continents of the Americas that the Native Americans accomplished. No other modern humans ever found empty lands like the Native Americans did. The European hordes always invaded other people lands, even Europe that belonged to the real ancient race of Europeans.
Holy shit- hostile much? “Native Americans” – are Siberian Americans. While it can be difficult to find, there is controversy surrounding the “Siberian Americans” were in the Americas first. *Tibetans separated from China about 5,000 years ago and within that time frame genetically changed to utilize oxygen at high altitudes. The “Native Americans” were not some unified people – but wiped each other out in numerous migrations from Siberia and East Asia, migrating southward. There is controversy about Ice Age and Clovis Culture – and found arrowheads and spearheads that predate the fluting Clovis points.
It isn’t settled – and even when it seems to be you should always ask whether it is or isn’t. After all, the banksters in power have a lot at stake on this question and the successful of the propaganda they peddle depends on their answer.
The “European hordes” do not always invade other peoples’ lands. What of the Mongols? The Ottoman Turks? The Bantu and the “Native American” tribes that invaded each other, tortured each other, and “stole” each other’s lands? What of the Maya and the Aztec and the Inca? You are retarded. If “Native Americans” are native to the Americas after coming from Siberia and East Asia about 14,000 years ago (and the modern descendants today are a result of those who came about 9,000 years ago wiping out those who came about 13,000 years ago – heads up — GENOCIDE in other words) then why aren’t modern Europeans native to Europe? You’re a moron. And a nihilist if you’re White. Please go die now. At least – don’t perpetuate your genes (if anyone White would have you).
If the Bible says that there were giants in the land, then guess what? There were giants in the land.
But that same Bible warns us not to get caught up in old wives fables. 8 feet tall is very believable, even before the Chicago Bulls and Utah Jazz started overpaying them to shoot hoops. And all of it was before PepsiCo started cannibalizing us with aborted fetuses flavoring 1500 of their products. Also keep in mind that in humans at least, cannibal behavior ends with shakes and tremors and ultimately death in fairly short order.
The Lodi Museum in Lodi Ca, until sometime after 1972 had 2 complete Red Haired giant mummies on display; the display included copper ornaments, clothing, tools and utensils.
Several accounts by visitors who viewed them exist.
I was through there in the summer of ‘74 and there was no such display or knowledge by staff of such?
I agree that it goes against the mainstream ‘history’ and validates biblical accounts and narratives.?
I saw a tv series show a few years back, a couple of stone workers who traveled the country looking at ancient stone works. They had one show on a mega wall (or walled city) around thru, I believe, Texas and Oklahoma. Just like these skulls and other giant skulls the authorities said there was nothing to see and had the area reburied. Anyone know of that? Seems like it might fit this story
Raises more questions…..
Why are we paying the Indians reparations for “taking over THEIR land” when they murdered an entire race of people and then took over the land for themselves?
The skeletons found were burred with shrouds? The Indians said they were cannibals. Who picks apart their dinner and puts the hair and bones back in the correct order and buries it?
I don’t doubt these people lived here, the skeletons prove they did…… I don’t believe the excuse the Indians gave for killing off an entire race of people.
@April, you seem to be forgetting that the “entire race of people” you so benevolently speak of were GIANT CANNIBALS who consistently terrorized the Native Americans, eating their men, women and children DEAD OR ALIVE. Did you not read the whole article or do you not have a shred of reading comprehension in you?
You are focusing on indian reparations for some ridiculous reason and not the fact that GIANT CANNIBALS once existed and the government is doing everything in their power to cover it up! Evolution is a lie! These giants come from somewhere, and the best information regarding this topic can be found in the book of GENESIS.
Thats exactly right.
Il faut lire le texte original. Les Paiutes avaient un de leurs clans cannibales aussi. Ils ne l’étaient pas tous, et dans bien d’autres peuples, cela s’est pratiqué. Sarah WINNEMUCCA, fille du chef indien, connaissait bien l’existence de ces géants cannibales. Elle a écrit son autobiographie.
Et tu te trompes de camp en tirant encore sur les Indiens car
1/ ils n’ont absolument pas éliminé une ‘race’ (?) entière : ceux qui les ont cherchés, provoqués, les ont trouvés. Face au CANON sans sommations – et non pas aux fusils d’Hollywood business- ils n’ont pas eu affaire à une lutte fairplay; ils ont été ‘génocidés’ pour installer le chemin de fer financé par les banksters qui n’ont rien d’humaniste. Si on te déloge de là où tu vis, tu dis OK ? Si on te nie le droit d’exister, soit tu as des c… et tu te défends, ou tu fuis là où on te retrouvera. Toutes les tueries sont d’autant plus blamables, inexcusables, quand c’est un état politique qui les PLANIFIE.
2/ ils n’ont pas repris leurs terres, à part Les LAKOTAS qui se sont acharnés jusqu’à ce qu’on leur laisse une miette de leur territoire.
Ils ont été trompés dans les prétendues négociations, des traquenards pour les tuer physiquement, ou leur faire signer des textes JAMAIS respectés par les ricains.
3/ Question dédommagements, tu peux chercher : ils n’ont eu quasiment rien, seules quelques tribus ont eu l’aumône. Et toujours parqués comme des sous-hommes, après avoir été déportés dans les zones les plus inhospitalières dont bien sûr les colons ne voulaient pas.
4/ Ils ont été patients, naïfs comme n’importe quel individu de bon fond.
5/ Enfin tailler un scalp est une manie d’origine anglaise. Les Indiens ont juste répondu par le même affront.
Le livre de Dee BROWN (éd. Opéra Mundi, 1973) ‘Enterre mon cœur [à Wounded Knee’] s’est voulu “un récit de la Conquête de l’Ouest américain, telle que les victimes l’ont vécue, en employant autant que possible leurs paroles”.
Si tu as du coeur, tu en pleureras.
Here’s the deal, if the general public ever knew the truth about giants. It would confirm the stories told from the Israelites in the bible and this would severely damage the LIE that’s been told across the world. This would change people’s opinions about God and His word and the elite will never have this story told period.
Their hubris has forgot truth does prevail. You can’t keep the genie in the bottle no matter how hard they suppress the truth.
Great point! There has been a huge effort to cover this information up. If confirmed, it would cause a paradigm shift. More people would believe the Bible!
I think H. P. Lovecraft used this story for a short story theme. Really scary account of a man lost in a cave …
Cant heat water from above. Dry friction caused by oil extraction is creating a way for the water to move through hot vents. Oil displaces water. No oil; and the water heats up as well. God forgive us.
Kieran Denahy
What does this have to do with the subject?
another article .
and of course you can heat water from an above source .
but that is kind of weaponizing.