Are they planning on using it? WEF removes article about “Mind Control using sound waves”


The WEF removed the 2018 article linked in this tweet about “Mind Control using sound waves…”

But why?

  • Are the about to use it? Are they already using it?
  • Are they willing to hide their next steps into controlling the masses?
  • Did they remove it for the same reason they deleted the article “you’ll own nothing?” Because then people will actually realize the ones involved in all of this…

Preparedness: Protect your home and car against devastating EMP, solar flare and lightning attacks with the best shield available today

You will find the deleted WEF article below:

Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works

Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works
Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works

At the moment, non-invasive neuromodulation – changing brain activity without the use of surgery – looks poised to usher in a new era of healthcare. Breakthroughs could include the better management of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, reducing the pain of migraines or even reversing cognitive disorders caused by brain injury

But what happens if this technique for altering our brain waves escapes regulation and falls into the wrong hands? Imagine a dictatorial regime with access to the tricks and tools to change the way its citizens think or behave.

That’s the ethical battleground that Antoine Jerusalem, a professor of engineering science at Oxford University, finds himself in as he researches the potential of ultrasound technology to tackle neurological diseases and disorders.

In this interview, conducted as part of the World Economic Forum’s annual gathering in the Middle East of scientists, government and business, he tells us more about this growing field of research.

Preparedness: You will never go without electricity with this portable power station

Controlling the brain with sound waves: how does it work?

Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.

If you want to get rid of neurons that have gone wild, for example in epilepsy, then you might want to crank up the energy to essentially kill them. But if you want to selectively promote or block the neuronal activity, you need to fine-tune your ultrasound waves carefully.

In other words, there’s a difference between ultrasound stimulation used for removing tissue, and ultrasound neuromodulation, which is aimed at controlling neuronal activity without damaging the tissue.

Ultrasound neuromodulation is something that definitely works, but that we still don’t understand.

Preparedness: Remove all the contaminants from your tap water with the best home filter available today

What social good can come of it?

The current buzzwords are Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, as well as traumatic brain injuries. But scientists are also looking at the spinal cord and peripheral nervous systems. As far as I am concerned, since the brain is the de facto center of decision for so many processes, any of them could be targeted.

Is it safe?

When attempting to ‘control’ neuronal activity by providing minute mechanical vibrations to a region of the brain, it’s important that the focus of the ultrasound, frequency and amplitude are properly tuned, or the brain can potentially be damaged.

The point is that we still don’t know how to tune all of this; and if I were to exaggerate a bit, I could say that our current approach is not that far off from fiddling around with the settings on a radio until we hear the right station.

One of the many difficulties is to know for sure that we are indeed controlling neurons with these sound waves, as opposed to damaging them. The truth is that we still don’t know how the process works. And if you don’t know how it works, you don’t know how much is “too much”.

Preparedness: SAVE your retirement money by investing in GOLD, SILVER and other PRECIOUS METALS

What are the biggest ethical challenges?

The potential of this technique is huge – by that I mean the sheer number of applications, as well as the ethical use.

From a biological perspective, it’s similar to drugs. It can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you. It’s all about staying within a given set of rules. From an ethical perspective, the world is changing so fast that it’s difficult to assess what will be acceptable tomorrow that is not today.

I am also convinced that human nature is such that if something can be done, it will be done. The question is by whom. I would rather have a fair society leading the dance than some rogue state without any respect for human or animal life. If we want to lead that dance 10 years from now, we need to start researching today.

How dystopian could it get?

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.

Health Ranger Store: Buy safe Food and non-GMO Products to heal you and the world

What can we do to safeguard its potential?

I am not going to argue that scientists are all wise and knowledgeable when it comes to what should and should not be done. Some of us will go as far as we can get away with. But that’s human nature, and not unique to scientists.

Either way, our job is to find something that is beneficial to humanity. And if you find a way to make somebody better, then you most likely also know how to do the contrary. The goal is to make sure that regulation prevents the latter, without impeding the former. I believe that this is the role of regulators. And I think that the European Union, where I work, is quite good at this.

Another role of politicians should be to provide a communication platform to explain the long vision of any given area of research. And it can be too early, or not a good idea, and the final decision might very well be to stop it. But in the long term, the public should have the potential benefits of a new technology explained to them in plain words, which is something that scientists are not necessarily good at.

Politicians should remember that if we don’t do it, then somebody somewhere will do it anyway…potentially unregulated.

Here’s an archive link to it… Here’s an archive link to the WEF’s you will own nothing article

So what are they hiding again? It seems they are using the same deleting tactics as the US at the beginning of the proxy war with Russia (Biolabs) and Pfizer (vaccine documents)…

So why are they hiding/deleting those files?

  • Are the about to use it? Are they already using it?
  • Are they willing to hide their next steps into controlling the masses?
  • Did they remove it for the same reason they deleted the article “you’ll own nothing?” Because then people will actually realize the ones involved in all of this… has been banned from ad networks and is now entirely reader-supported CLICK HERE TO SUPPORT MY WORK… I will send you a small gemstone if you give more than 25$… Thanks in advance!

Here some things to add to your disaster & preparedness kit:

qfiles by steve quayle


  1. It’s already being used on multiple fronts.One of the most common is to prevent loitering and theft in teenagers.It produces a sound that supposedly only the young can still hear and it’s annoying enough they leave.Its used mainly in Europe
    It’s used elsewhere for other reasons

  2. They are already using it.

    Search around for a .pdf called “THE SOVIET ART OF BRAINWASHING”… here are some quotes:

    “Mild shock of the electric variety can, and does, produce the re-cooperation of a
    rebellious body organ” page 12

    “While it is not borne out that electric shock has any therapeutic value, so far as
    making the individual more sane, it is adequately brought out that its punishment value will create in the patient a greater co-operative attitude.” page 12

    “no great amount of time should be expended upon the individual, but emotional duress, or electric shock, or brain surgery should be resorted to, should Communist propaganda persuasion fail.” page 13

    “The society should be worked up to the level where every recalcitrant young man can be brought into court and assigned to a psychopolitical operative, be given electric shocks, and reduced into unimaginative docility for the remainder of his days.” page 27 <——— this is where we are today

      • “Russians” lolol. Antoine JEWRUSALEM is JEWISH. that is the core of your problem. Until these filth are stripped of their power & influence? Kiss your civilization good bye.

  3. I would venture to say that every ‘bad’ thing that happens to unsuspecting human beings is caused by some other human being of suspicious character, that just plain enjoys being evil. They always want to sugar coat it by saying “oh, but the good it could do!” Look at all the damage our human thinking has gotten us into since the ‘Fall of Man’, and all the ‘good’ it was supposed to do! I believe the saying goes, “Nothing new under the sun!”

  4. Because 90% of the population knows nothing of globalism WEF style, don’t care much about anything, nihilistic, self absorbed, or knows who Claus Schwab is , Agenda 2030, details of the globalist plans world wide, etc. it may be that gov. is already using this technology since so many dimwits prevail. It is so hard to find even older adults w/ head on straight.

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.