While planting trees can no longer save our atmosphere .. planting trees can save the local wildlife and pollinators, at least for now.
This for now is very important .. yes the weather will be more savage etc.. due to climate change but if you have a row of trees with undergrowth a some high level plant diversity your local hedgehogs, local insects, local birds etc.. might survive … just that little bit longer ( by a few decades ) thanks to this.
I think as ecological collapse happen, we should do everything in our power to at least ensure that a few generations of little animals do not suffer the full brunt of it at least for a little longer ( eventually if or when CO2 reaches 500ppm we are going to be so screwed ).
plant tree will help if you learn to turn them into char coal or better biochar and lock carbon forever. This require a lot of work hour so I don’t know will it work at large scale
Okay, planting trees won’t save us, but I can get beauty, shade, fruit or nut crops, and provide a home for wildlife with trees…and it doesn’t cost much. So, I plant the trees. By the way, we are collapsing anyway.
Trees are good for your local environment, clean your local air, support wildlife, create shade, help condense moisture, slow the wind, diminish the advance of deserts, support the banks of streams and rivers. There’s no reason not to plant trees unless they are invasive and destructive.
I have to admit, I’m surprised to see F instead of SI (or rather derived) units. I think it’s the first time I saw someone used those in the context of global warming.
To stay on topic – we have plenty of areas that are not used for agriculture and could potentially be used to plant trees. Of course that won’t be enough, but it will help.
Edit: another thing – planting trees between fields would definitely be helpful both to the climate and for soil-saving (reduced wind speed and natural barrier for fine soil particles carried by wind). Win-win.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Hey, Friends!
Get On The List To Receive Your Daily Dose Of Weird News And Amazing Phenomena
While planting trees can no longer save our atmosphere .. planting trees can save the local wildlife and pollinators, at least for now.
This for now is very important .. yes the weather will be more savage etc.. due to climate change but if you have a row of trees with undergrowth a some high level plant diversity your local hedgehogs, local insects, local birds etc.. might survive … just that little bit longer ( by a few decades ) thanks to this.
I think as ecological collapse happen, we should do everything in our power to at least ensure that a few generations of little animals do not suffer the full brunt of it at least for a little longer ( eventually if or when CO2 reaches 500ppm we are going to be so screwed ).
Tech, tech is the answer. Geoengineering on a techitech scale. No thanks.
May be they won’t by themselves, but if we planted trees AND cut back emissions I bet it would work.
Who the fuck do they think they are kidding?
3.6 F, not great, not terrible
plant tree will help if you learn to turn them into char coal or better biochar and lock carbon forever. This require a lot of work hour so I don’t know will it work at large scale
Okay, planting trees won’t save us, but I can get beauty, shade, fruit or nut crops, and provide a home for wildlife with trees…and it doesn’t cost much. So, I plant the trees. By the way, we are collapsing anyway.
Planting trees , is good for lots of reasons.
Trees are good for your local environment, clean your local air, support wildlife, create shade, help condense moisture, slow the wind, diminish the advance of deserts, support the banks of streams and rivers. There’s no reason not to plant trees unless they are invasive and destructive.
This is a prop for geoengineering.
I have to admit, I’m surprised to see F instead of SI (or rather derived) units. I think it’s the first time I saw someone used those in the context of global warming.
To stay on topic – we have plenty of areas that are not used for agriculture and could potentially be used to plant trees. Of course that won’t be enough, but it will help.
Edit: another thing – planting trees between fields would definitely be helpful both to the climate and for soil-saving (reduced wind speed and natural barrier for fine soil particles carried by wind). Win-win.